|
Background Information
Airline management is buying high-priced lobbyists in
Washington, D.C., in an attempt to:
• Take away our right to strike if management refuses to
agree to a reasonable contract or stonewalls in
negotiations.
• Allow management to refuse to negotiate in good faith
with us.
• Eliminate your democratic right to vote on new
contracts.
Management intends to accomplish this by getting
Congress to change the Railway Labor Act -- the law that
governs airline labor negotiations.
The airlines have begun a very expensive campaign to
sell their plan in Washington. Under this scheme, if
contract negotiations break down and it is determined
that no agreement can be reached, our right to strike
would be eliminated. Instead, an arbitrator would be
appointed by the government to pick either the airline’s
last offer or the union’s last offer as the contract
that is implemented. The arbitrator will be forced to
consider the airline’s profitability and needs of its
shareholders in making his decision. The needs of
workers will come last.
The airlines’ plan is being pitched by a front group
called CESTA (Communities for Economic Strength Through
Aviation). Their plan eliminates all incentive for
management to negotiate with us. Management will wait to
get to the end of the process, declare an impasse, and
present its low-ball offer to the arbitrator, who will
then compare it to the union’s last offer. Since the
arbitrator must consider the needs of the shareholders
and the airline’s profitability, this all but ensures
the arbitrator will pick management’s contract to be
implemented. Workers will not get to vote on whether or
not the deal picked by the arbitrator is satisfactory.
Send your CEO a letter demanding the airline oppose this
campaign to take away our rights.
Additional background
Although the Railway Labor Act is not perfect, and even
though collective bargaining under the law can be
drawn-out and frustrating for everyone involved,
good-faith collective bargaining and compliance with
existing contract language on management's part would
significantly improve airline labor relations. Changing
existing laws would make negotiations virtually
meaningless since management wouldn’t have any
motivation to reach an agreement.
The current process promotes collective bargaining, and
is successful in 99 percent of all cases. The RLA is
successful because it requires several stages of
negotiations to occur before any work stoppage can
happen. Each stage of the process is designed to avoid
an interruption in flying, while putting pressure on all
parties to reach agreement while talks are in progress.
The proposed changes would take away our right to strike
and to vote on an agreement. As a result, the changes
proposed would make bad worker/management relationships
worse because employees would no longer have any means
to protect themselves against a vicious management that
fails to negotiate in good faith.
Current negotiations at airlines that are in financial
trouble show that, when properly motivated, management
can engage in constructive relationships with employees.
Southwest Airlines, the airline that’s considered to
have the best labor relations overall, says the law
should not be changed. Southwest management knows how
effective it is to work in partnership with employees.
But management at other carriers only seem to be
interested in good relationships when negotiating for
concessions. Heavy-handed government regulations that
take over the negotiations process will ensure that
management continues this destructive trend.
Senators John McCain, Trent Lott, and Conrad Burns
introduced legislation on this issue in 2002’s 107th
Congress, but failed to gain support in the
Democratic-controlled Senate. To date, no legislation on
this issue has been introduced in 2003’s 108th Congress.
But McCain and Lott, who now heads the Senate aviation
subcommittee, have openly said passing a binding
arbitration bill is a top priority, and the Republican
Congress is inclined to support it. That’s why all
aviation workers must band together to actively fight to
keep our rights.
|